Vol. 37 No. 1 (2017)
Articles

Thoman Kuhn and Helminthology

Martín Orensanz
Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - CONICET

Published 2017-05-01

Keywords

  • Thomas Kuhn,
  • helmintología,
  • paradigma,
  • ejemplar,
  • matriz disciplinaria
  • Thomas Kuhn,
  • helminthology,
  • paradigm,
  • exemplar,
  • disciplinary matrix

Abstract

Thomas Kuhn’s philosophy of science has been used in several areas of biology, and here we examine the possibility of applying kuhnian philosophy to helminthology. We offer two possible interpretations of the history of that discipline. In our first interpretation, we only use the concepts Kuhn introduces in the first stage of his works. In the second interpretation, we use the concepts of disciplinary matrix and exemplar. According to the first interpretation, the pre-paradigmatic period of helminthology started between the 16th and 17th centuries, and continued up until the second half of the 19th century, when helminthology acquired its first paradigm. From the point of view of the second interpretation, the first disciplinary matrix for zoology was inaugurated by Aristotle, who also delivered the first exemplar for the study of helminths.

References

  1. Amici, R. R. (2001), “The History of Italian Parasitology”, Veterinary Parasitology, 98 (1), pp. 3-30.
  2. Aristóteles (1992), Investigación sobre los animales, Madrid, Gredos.
  3. Begon, M., Harper, J. L. y Townsend, C. R. (1995), Ecología: Individuos, poblaciones y comunidades, Barcelona, Omega.
  4. Bhopal, R. (1999), “Paradigms in Epidemiology Textbooks: In the Footsteps of Thomas Kuhn”, American Journal of Public Health, 89 (8), pp. 1162-1165.
  5. Cobb, N. A. (1890), A Nematode Formula, Sydney, Government Printer.
  6. Cordero del Campillo, M. (1989), “The History of Veterinary Parasitology in Spain”, Veterinary Parasitology, 33 (1), pp. 93-116.
  7. Cox, F. E. (2002), “History of Human Parasitology”, Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 15 (4), pp. 595-612.
  8. Crofton, H. D. (1971), “A Model of Host-Parasite Relationships”, Parasitology, 63 (3), pp. 343-364.
  9. Dreyer, G., Mattos, D., Figueredo-Silva, J. y Norões, J. (2009), “Mudanças de paradigmas na filariose bancroftiana”, Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 55 (3), pp. 355-362.
  10. Enigk, K. y Habil, H. C. (1989), “History of Veterinary Parasitology in Germany and Scandinavia”, Veterinary Parasitology, 33 (1), pp. 65-91.
  11. Ewald, P. W. (1995), “The Evolution of Virulence: A Unifying Link between Parasitology and Ecology”, The Journal of Parasitology, 81 (5), pp. 659-669.
  12. Farley, J. (1972), “The Spontaneous Generation Controversy (1700-1860): The Origin of Parasitic Worms”, Journal of the History of Biology, 5 (1), pp. 95-125.
  13. Graham, M. H. y Dayton, P. K. (2002), “On the Evolution of Ecological Ideas: Paradigms and Scientific Progress”, Ecology, 83 (6), pp. 1481-1489.
  14. Grove, D. I. (1990), A History of Human Helminthology, Wallingford, C. A. B. International.
  15. Hoeppli, R. (1956), “The Knowledge of Parasites and Parasitic Infections from Ancient Times to the 17th Century”, Experimental Parasitology, 5 (4), pp. 398-419.
  16. Krebs, C. J. (1995), “Two Paradigms of Population Regulation”, Wildlife Research, 22 (1), pp. 1-10.
  17. Kuhn, T. S. (1957), The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
  18. Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1ª ed.
  19. Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2ª ed. ampliada.
  20. Kuhn, T. S. (1977), The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  21. Leeuwenhoek, A. (1800), The Select Works of Anthony van Leeuwenhoek: Containing his Microscopical Discoveries in many of the Works of Nature, vol. 1, Londres, G. Sydney.
  22. Matzke, M. A. y Matzke, A. J. (1997), “Kuhnian Revolutions in Biology: Peter Mitchell and the Chemiosmotic Theory”, BioEssays, 19 (1), pp. 92-93.
  23. Mayr, E. (1994), “The Advance of Science and Scientific Revolutions”, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 30 (4), pp. 328-334.
  24. Olby, R. (1974), The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA, Londres, Macmillan.
  25. Olby, R. (1994), The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA, Nueva York, Dover, 2ª ed. ampliada.
  26. O’Malley, M. A. y Boucher, Y. (2005), “Paradigm Change in Evolutionary Microbiology”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36 (1), pp. 183-208.
  27. Orensanz, M. y Denegri, G. (2017), “La helmintología según la filosofía de la ciencia de Imre Lakatos”, Salud Colectiva, 13 (1), pp. 139-148.
  28. Paine, R. T. (2002), “Advances in Ecological Understanding: By Kuhnian Revolution or Conceptual Evolution?”, Ecology, 83 (6), pp. 1553-1559.
  29. Pickett, S. T., Parker, V. T. y Fiedler, P. L. (1992), “The New Paradigm in Ecology: Implications for Conservation Biology above the Species Level” en Fiedler, P. L. y Jain, S. K. (eds.), Conservation Biology: The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation Preservation and Management, Boston, Springer, pp. 65-88.
  30. Poulin, R. (2000), “Manipulation of Host Behaviour by Parasites: A Weakening Paradigm?”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267 (1445), pp. 787-792.
  31. Ramsay, W. (1668), Elminthologia, or Some Physical Considerations of the Matter, Origination, and Several Species of Wormes Macerating and Direfully Cruciating every part of the Bodies of Mankind, Londres, John Streater.
  32. Redi, F. (1684), Osservazioni intorno agli animali viventi che si trovano negli animali viventi, Florencia, Piero Matini, all’insegna del Lion d’oro.
  33. Redi, F. (1688/1909), Experiments on the Generation of Insects, Chicago, Open Court.
  34. Ruse, M. (1979), The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  35. Ruse, M. (1989), The Darwinian Paradigm: Essays on its History, Philosophy, and Religious Implications, Londres, Routledge.
  36. Ruse, M. (2005), “The Darwinian Revolution, as seen in 1979 and as seen Twenty-Five Years Later in 2004”, Journal of the History of Biology, 38 (1), pp. 3-17.
  37. Schwabe, C. (1982), “The Current Epidemiological Revolution in Veterinary Medicine: Part I”, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 1 (1), pp. 5-15.
  38. Strohman, R. C. (1997), “The Coming Kuhnian Revolution in Biology”, Nature Biotechnology, 15 (3), pp. 194-200.
  39. Touratier, L. (1989), “History of Veterinary Parasitology in France”, Veterinary Parasitology, 33 (1), pp. 45-63.
  40. Tyson, E. (1683), “Lumbricus Latus, or a Discourse Read before the Royal Society of the Joynted Worm”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 13, pp. 113-144.
  41. Weiss, K. M. (1996), “Is There a Paradigm Shift in Genetics? Lessons from the Study of Human Diseases”, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 5 (1), pp. 259-265.
  42. Wilkins, A. S. (1996), “Are There ‘Kuhnian’ Revolutions in Biology?”, BioEssays, 18 (9), pp. 695-696.