Vol. 18 Nro. 2 (1998)
Articles

Partituras, lienzos, palabras: sobre la asimetría de las artes

PDF (Español (España))
  • Montserrat Bordes Solanas
Montserrat Bordes Solanas
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36446/af.e585

Published 1998-11-01

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Sorne traditional aesthetic views assume that behind the variated appearance of the different arts lies a common unifying nature.
In this paper (which does not directly address the realism-scepticism debate) attention is directed mainly to what may be called "the asymmetries in the arts". I point out that substantive asymmetries would undermine the possibility of a non-disjuntive aesthetics and explore sorne relevant asymmetries which generate scepticism whether a general answer may be given to the ontological question "what is art?". Finally I consider the basic theories on the ontological status of a work of art and argue that neither is able to account for the required multiple properties.

PDF (Español (España))

References

  1. Beardsley, M. C.,1981: Aesthetics. Problems in the philosophy of criticism, Cambridge, Hackett Publishing Co. Primera edición de 1958.
  2. Bell. C., 1914: Art, Nueva York, Frederick Stokes.
  3. Collingwood, R. G., 1958: The principles of art, Londres, Oxford University Press. Primera edición de 1938.
  4. Croce, B. ,1964: Aesthetic: as science of expression and general linguístic, Nueva York, Noonday Press. Primera edición de 1902.
  5. Davies. S., 1991: Definitions of art. Londres, Cornell University Press.
  6. Dickie. G., 1974: Art and the aesthetic: an institutional analysis, Thaca, Cornell University Press.
  7. Goldman, A. H., 1995: Aesthetic value, Oxford, Westview Press.
  8. Goodman, N., 1976: Languages of art, Indianapolis, Hacket Publishing Co. Primera edición de 1968.
  9. Hospers, J., 1956: “The Croce-Collingwood theory of art”, Philosophy. XXXI, 119, pp. 291-308.
  10. Hospers, J., 1967: “Problems of aesthetics", The Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, ed. por P. Edwards, vol. 1, Nueva York, Macmillan Free Press, pp. 35-56.
  11. Santayana, G., 1955: The sense of beauty, Nueva York, Dover. Primera edición de 1896.
  12. Walton, K. L., 1970: “Categories of art”, The Philosophical Review, 79, pp. 334-367.
  13. Wollheim, R., 1980: Art and its objects, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Primera edición de 1968.