Vol. 44 No. 2 (2024)
Articles

Simple Minimal and Maximal Properties: David Hommen on the Distinction between Positive and Negative Properties

PDF (Español (España))
  • Tomas Alvarado
Tomas Alvarado
Instituto de Filosofía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36446/af.e1068

Published 2024-11-08

Keywords

  • Propiedades,
  • Propiedades negativas,
  • Propiedades minimales,
  • Propiedades maximales
  • Properties,
  • Negative Properties,
  • Minimal Properties,
  • Maximal Properties
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Since the work of John Cook Wilson (1926) several analyses have been proposed for the distinction between ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ properties (cf. Ayer, 1952; Gale, 1970; Hirsch, 1989). These analyses have relied on the ‘specification’, the ‘incompatibility’, or the ‘strength’ of properties. Some have proposed, for example, that negative properties are those that do not specify other negative properties, or those that are not incompatible with other negative properties, or those that have ‘less strength’ that their complementary properties. Many difficulties affect these analyses. Most of them rely on the concept of the ‘quality’ of a property, i. e., the fact that a property is either positive or negative. Many think that relying on this concept could be circular. Other analyses work under the supposition that there are structures of subordination, like genera-species or determinables-determinates, that seem to presuppose positive properties. David Hommen has proposed another analysis (2018) in terms of ‘minimal’ or ‘maximal’ properties. According to Hommen, a property is negative if and only if it has simple minimals in structures under certain conditions. This work discusses and criticizes Hommen’s proposal. It appears that it requires several qualifications. Even under them, nevertheless, it has fatal problems.

PDF (Español (España))

References

  1. Alvarado, J. T. (2020). A metaphysics of platonic universals and their instantiations: Shadow of universals. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-53393-9
  2. Alvarado, J. T. (2023). Omnis negatio est determinatio: La cuestión de los universales negativos. Teorema, 42(2), 107-132.
  3. Alvarado, J. T. (2024). Álgebras de universales. Crítica: Revista hispanoamericana de filosofía, 56(166), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2024.1500
  4. Armstrong, D. M. (1978). Universals and scientific realism. Volume 2: A theory of universals. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Armstrong, D. M. (1989). Universals: An opinionated introduction. Westview.
  6. Armstrong, D. M. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Ayer, A. J. (1952). Negation. The Journal of Philosophy, 49, 797-815. Citado por la reimpresión en A. J. Ayer (1954), Philosophical Essays (pp. 36-65). Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Bealer, G. (1982). Quality and concept. Clarendon Press.
  9. Berto, F. (2014). Absolute contradiction, dialetheism, and revenge. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 7(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175502031400001X
  10. Berto, F. (2015). A modality called ‘negation’. Mind, 124, 761-793. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv026
  11. Berto F. & Restall, G. (2019). Negation on the Australian plan. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48, 1119-1144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09510-2
  12. Edwards, D. (2014). Properties. Polity Press.
  13. Etchemendy, J. (1999). The concept of logical consequence. CSLI Publications.
  14. Funkhouser, E. (2014). The logical structure of kinds. Oxford University Press.
  15. Gale, R. M. (1970). Negative statements. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7(3), 206-217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20009350
  16. Hirsch, E. (1989). Negativity and complexity: Some logical considerations. Synthese, 81, 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869333
  17. Hommen, D. (2013). Negative properties, real and irreducible. Philosophia naturalis, 50(2), 383-406.
  18. Hommen, D. (2016). Absences as latent potentialities. Philosophical Papers, 45(3), 401-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2016.1245829
  19. Hommen, D. (2018). Making sense of negative properties. Axiomathes, 28, 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-017-9337-3
  20. Horn, L. R. (2001). A natural history of negation. CSLI Publications.
  21. Horn, L. R. & Wansing, H. (2020). Negation. En E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/negation
  22. Sommers, F. (1963). Types and ontology. Philosophical Review, 72, 327-363. Reimpreso en P. F. Strawson (Ed.), (1967), Philosophical Logic (pp. 183-169). Oxford University Press.
  23. Sommers, F. (1970). The calculus of terms. Mind, 79(313), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXXIX.313.1
  24. Sommers, F. (1971). Structural ontology. Philosophia, 1(1/2), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02378925
  25. van Inwagen, P. (2004). A theory of properties. En D. Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. (vol. 1, pp. 107-138). Oxford University Press. Reimpreso en van Inwagen, P. (2014), Existence: Essays in Ontology (pp. 153-182). Cambridge University Press.
  26. Westerhoff, J. (2002). Defining ‘ontological category’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 102(1), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00058.x
  27. Wilson, J. C. (1926), Statement and inference with other philosophical papers. Clarendon Press.
  28. Zalta, E. N. (1983). Abstract objects: An introduction to axiomatic metaphysics. Reidel.
  29. Zalta, E. N. (1988). Intensional logic and the metaphysics of intentionality. The MIT Press.
  30. Zangwill, N. (2003). Negative properties, determination and conditionals. Topoi, 22, 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024922104807
  31. Zangwill, N. (2011). Negative properties. Noûs, 45(3), 528-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00776.x