Forthcoming
Critical Notes

The Nature of the Knowledge of our Mental World: On Una trilogía que importa: Autoconocimiento, deliberación y engaño, by Nora Stigol, Alicia Gianella, and Diego Lawler

Gustavo Fernandez Acevedo
Facultades de Humanidades y Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.

Published 2025-09-11

Keywords

  • Autoconocimiento,
  • Autoengaño,
  • Explicación,
  • Racionalidad,
  • Voluntarismo doxástico
  • Self-knowledge,
  • Self-deception,
  • Explanation,
  • Rationality,
  • Doxastic Voluntarism

Abstract

The book under review presents a comprehensive set of problems and theoretical perspectives on self-knowledge and related issues, particularly self-deception. We will examine three closely interconnected questions here: the relationship between self-knowledge and self-deception, the role of rationality in self-knowledge, the extent to which beliefs about ourselves are susceptible to volitional influences, and, finally, the possibility that different explanatory models may coexist.

References

  1. Badhwar, N. K. (2008). Is realism really bad for you? A realistic response. The Journal of Philosophy, 105(2), 85-107. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil200810526
  2. Cook, J. T. (1987). Deciding to believe without self-deception. The Journal of Philosophy, 84(8), 441-446. https://doi.org/10.2307/2027001
  3. Davidson, D. (1985). Engaño y división. En Mente, mundo y acción. Paidós.
  4. Funkhouser, E. (2003). Willing belief and the norm of truth. Philosophical Studies, 115, 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025094823262
  5. Ho, T. H. (2022). Positive illusion and the normativity of substantive and structural rationality. Philosophical Explorations, 26(3), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2022.2160876
  6. Holton, R. (2001).What is the role of the self in self-deception? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 101(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7372.2003.00021.x
  7. Kaufmann, M., Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., & Pekrun, R. (2019). Do positive illusions of control foster happiness? Emotion, 19(6), 1014-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000499
  8. Makridakis, S., & Moleskis, A. (2015). The costs and benefits of positive illusions, Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00859
  9. McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009). The evolution of misbelief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(6), 493-561. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990975.
  10. Rodríguez González, M. (2009). El problema de la identidad personal. En P. Chacón Fuertes, V. L. Guedán Pécker, J. A. Guerrero del Amo, J. Hermoso Durán, J. I. Morera de Guijarro & M. Rodríguez González, Filosofía de la psicología (pp. 279-301). Biblioteca Nueva.
  11. Schütz, A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2017). Positive illusions and the happy mind. En M. D. Robinson & M. Eid (Eds.), The happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being (pp. 177-193). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58763-9_10
  12. Stigol, N., Gianella, A., & Lawler, D. (2024). Una trilogía que importa: Autoconocimiento, deliberación y engaño. EUDEBA.
  13. Taylor, S., & Brown, J. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193-210. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
  14. Taylor, S., & J. Brown (1994). positive illusions and well-being revisited separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 21-27. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.21
  15. Van Leeuwen, D. S. N. (2009). Self-deception won’t make you happy. Social Theory and Practice, 35(1), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract20093516
  16. Watson, G. (2004). The work of the will. En Agency and answerability: Selected essays (pp. 123-158). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272273.003.0006
  17. Williams, B. (1973). Deciding to believe. En Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956-1972 (pp. 136-151). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621253.011