Articles
Published 2015-11-01
Keywords
- Defensa,
- Liberalismo,
- Republicanismo
- Defense,
- Liberalism,
- Republicanism
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This paper analyses Carlos Nino’s general theory of legitimate defense and its relation with his conception about liberalism in criminal law. There are at least two problematic cases for his theory of legitimate defense. It is proposed an alternative availabe to avoid those problems which implies to advocate to the notion of non domination.
References
1. Colb, S. F. (2009), “Why is Torture ‘Different’ and How Different is it?” Cardozo Law Review, 30(4), pp. 1411-1474.
2. Duff, A. (2001), Punishment, Communication and Community, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
3. Duff, A. (2010), “Blame, Moral Standing and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Trial”, Ratio, XXIII(2), pp. 123-140.
4. Gargarella, R. (2008), De la injusticia penal a la justicia social, Colombia, Siglo del Hombre Editores y Universidad de los Andes.
5. Green, S. P. (2011), “Just Deserts in Unjust Societies: A Case-Specific Approach” en Duff y Green (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
6. Locke, J. (1689/2010), The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration, Nueva York, Classics Books International.
7. McMahan, J. (1994), “Self Defense and The Problem of the Innocent Attacker”, Ethics, 104(2), pp. 252-290.
8. McMahan, J. (2008), “Torture in Principle and in Practice”, Public Affairs Quarterly, 22(2), pp. 91-108.
9. Nino, C. S. (1980), Los límites de la responsabilidad penal, Buenos Aires, Astrea.
10. Nino, C. S. (1982), La legítima defensa, Buenos Aires, Astrea.
11. Nino, C. S. (2008), Maurino, G. (comp.), Fundamentos de derecho penal, Buenos Aires, Gedisa.
12. Pettit, P. (1997), Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
13. Ruggiero, V. (2009), La violencia política: Un análisis criminológico, México, Anthropos.
14. Whitman, J. (2004), “Between Self Defense and Vengeance/Between Social Contract and Monopoly Vengeance”, Tulsa Law Review, 39(4), pp. 901-923.
15. Wösner, M. (2006), Die Notwehr und ihre Einschränkungen in Deutschland und in den USA, Berlín, Duncker und Humblot.
2. Duff, A. (2001), Punishment, Communication and Community, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
3. Duff, A. (2010), “Blame, Moral Standing and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Trial”, Ratio, XXIII(2), pp. 123-140.
4. Gargarella, R. (2008), De la injusticia penal a la justicia social, Colombia, Siglo del Hombre Editores y Universidad de los Andes.
5. Green, S. P. (2011), “Just Deserts in Unjust Societies: A Case-Specific Approach” en Duff y Green (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
6. Locke, J. (1689/2010), The Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration, Nueva York, Classics Books International.
7. McMahan, J. (1994), “Self Defense and The Problem of the Innocent Attacker”, Ethics, 104(2), pp. 252-290.
8. McMahan, J. (2008), “Torture in Principle and in Practice”, Public Affairs Quarterly, 22(2), pp. 91-108.
9. Nino, C. S. (1980), Los límites de la responsabilidad penal, Buenos Aires, Astrea.
10. Nino, C. S. (1982), La legítima defensa, Buenos Aires, Astrea.
11. Nino, C. S. (2008), Maurino, G. (comp.), Fundamentos de derecho penal, Buenos Aires, Gedisa.
12. Pettit, P. (1997), Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
13. Ruggiero, V. (2009), La violencia política: Un análisis criminológico, México, Anthropos.
14. Whitman, J. (2004), “Between Self Defense and Vengeance/Between Social Contract and Monopoly Vengeance”, Tulsa Law Review, 39(4), pp. 901-923.
15. Wösner, M. (2006), Die Notwehr und ihre Einschränkungen in Deutschland und in den USA, Berlín, Duncker und Humblot.