Hacia nuevos derechos humanos en la era de la neurociencia y la neurotecnología
Publicado 2021-05-01
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Resumo
Los rápidos avances en neurociencia y neurotecnología abren un conjunto de posibilidades sin precedentes en el acceso, colecta, diseminación y manipulación de datos del cerebro humano. Estos desarrollos plantean importantes desafíos a los derechos humanos que deben abordarse para evitar consecuencias no deseadas. Este trabajo evalúa las implicaciones de los diferentes usos de las neurotecnologías en relación a los derechos humanos y sugiere que el marco actual de derechos humanos puede no ser suficiente para responder a estos desafíos emergentes. Después de analizar la relación entre neurociencia y derechos humanos, identificamos cuatro nuevos derechos que pueden ser de gran relevancia en las próximas décadas: el derecho a la libertad cognitiva, el derecho a la privacidad mental, el derecho a la integridad mental y el derecho a la continuidad psicológica.
Referências
- Aharoni, E., Vincent, G.M., Harenski, C.L., Calhoun, V.D., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Gazzaniga, M.S., & Kiehl, K.A. (2013). Neuroprediction of future rearrest. Proc Natl Acad Sci., 110(15), 6223-6228.
- Alston, P. (1984). Conjuring up new human rights: A proposal for quality control. Am J Int Law, 78(3), 607-621.
- Andorno, R. (2013). Principles of international biolaw: Seeking common ground at the intersection of bioethics and human rights. Bruylant.
- Armstrong, B.C., Ruiz-Blondet, M.V., Khalifian, N., Kurtz, K.J., Jin, Z., & Laszlo, S. (2015). Brainprint: Assessing the uniqueness, collectability, and permanence of a novel method for ERP biometrics. Neurocomputing, 166, 59-67.
- Ashworth, A. (2008). Self-incrimination in European human rights law – A pregnant pragmatism? Cardozo Law Review, 30(3), 751-774.
- Baron-Cohen, S. (2004). Essential difference: Male and female brains and the truth about autism. Basic Books.
- Beitz, C.R. (2011). The idea of human rights. Oxford University Press.
- Berlin, I. (1959). Two concepts of liberty: an inaugural lecture delivered before the University of Oxford on 31 October 1958. Clarendon Press.
- Biondi, F., & Skrypchuk, L. (2017). Use your brain (and light) for innovative human-machine interfaces. En I. Nunes (Ed.), Advances in human factors and system interactions (pp. 99-105). Springer.
- Boire, R. G. (2003). Mind matters. Journal of Cognitive Liberties, 4(1), 7-10.
- Brigham, K., & Kumar, B. (2010). Subject identification from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals during imagined speech. Documento presentado en Biometrics: Theory Applications and Systems (BTAS), 2010 Fourth IEEE International Conference.
- Bublitz, J.-C. (2013). My mind is mine!? Cognitive liberty as a legal concept. En E. Hildt & A. G. Franke (Eds.), Cognitive enhancement: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 233-264). Springer.
- Campisi, P., La Rocca, D., & Scarano, G. (2012). EEG for automatic person recognition. Computer, 45(7), 87-89.
- Charo, R.A. (2015). Yellow lights for emerging technologies. Science, 349(6246), 384-385.
- Decker, M., & Fleischer, T. (2008). Contacting the brain-aspects of a technology assessment of neural implants. Biotechnol J., 3(12), 1502-1510.
- Dick, P. K. (2002). The minority report and other classic stories. Citadel Press.
- Diggelmann, O., & Cleis, M.N. (2014). How the right to privacy became a Human Right. Human Rights Law Review, 14(3), 441-458.
- Dinev, T., Hart, P. (2004). Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents-measurement validity and a regression model. Behav Inform Technol, 23(6), 413-422.
- Ellegaard, M., & Kragh, K. (2015). Moral enhancement and persistent violent offenders. Roskilde University. Philosophy and Science Studies. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43031078.pdf [Consulta: 21 de diciembre 2020].
- Fagan, A. (2005). Human rights. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/hum-rts [Consulta: 29 de marzo 2017].
- Fagan, A. (2015). Human rights: Between idealism and realism. Nordic J Hum Rights, 33(3), 274-275.
- Farahany, N.A. (2012). Incriminating thoughts. Stanford Law Rev, 64, 351.
- Fernández, A., Sriraman, N., Gurevitz, B., & Ouiller, O. (2015). Pervasive neurotechnology: A groundbreaking analysis of 10,000+ patent filings transforming medicine, health, entertainment and business. SharpBrains.
- Frank, M.J., Samanta, J., Moustafa, A.A., & Sherman, S.J. (2007). Hold your horses: Impulsivity, deep brain stimulation, and medication in parkinsonism. Science, 318(5854), 1309-1312.
- Goodenough, O. R., & Tucker, M. (2010). Law and cognitive neuroscience. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci, 6, 61-92.
- Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (2014). Gray Matters. Integrative Approaches for Neuroscience, Ethics and Society, vol. 1. Bioethics Commission.
- Greely, H. T. (2009). Law and the revolution in neuroscience: An early look at the field. Akron L Rev, 42, 687.
- Habermas, J. (2010). The concept of human dignity and the realistic utopia of human rights. Metaphilosophy, 41(4), 464-480.
- Haynes, J.-D., Sakai, K., Rees, G., Gilbert, S., Frith, C., & Passingham, R.E. (2007). Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Curr Biol, 17(4), 323-328.
- Herff, C., Heger, D., de Pesters, A., Telaar, D., Brunner, P., Schalk, G., & Schultz, T. (2015). Brain-to-text: decoding spoken phrases from phone representations in the brain. Front Neurosci, 9, 217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00217
- Holbrook, C., Izuma, K., Deblieck, C., Fessler, D. M., & Iacoboni, M. (2016). Neuromodulation of group prejudice and religious belief. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 11(3), 387-394.
- Houeto, J., Mesnage, V., Mallet, L., Pillon, B., Gargiulo, M., du Moncel, S.T., & Cornu, P. (2012). Behavioural disorders, Parkinson’s disease and subthalamic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 72(6), 701-707.
- Iacono, W.G. (2008). Accuracy of polygraph techniques: Problems using confessions to determine ground truth. Physiol Behav, 95(1–2), 24-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.06.001
- Ienca, M., & Haselager, P. (2016). Hacking the brain: brain-computer interfacing technology and the ethics of neurosecurity. Ethics Inf Technol, 18(2), 117-129.
- Illes, J. (2003). Neuroethics in a new era of neuroimaging. Am J Neuroradiol, 24(9), 1739-1741.
- Klaming, L, & Haselager, P. (2013). Did my brain implant make me do it? Questions raised by DBS regarding psychological continuity, responsibility for action and mental competence. Neuroethics, 6(3), 527-539.
- Koch, W., Teipel, S., Mueller, S., Benninghoff, J., Wagner, M., Bokde, A.L., & Meindl, T. (2012). Diagnostic power of default mode network resting state fMRI in the detection of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging, 33(3), 466-478.
- Kozel, F.A., Johnson, K.A., Mu, Q., Grenesko. E.L., Laken, S.J., George, M.S. (2005). Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiatry, 58(8), 605-613.
- La Rocca, D., Campisi, P., & Scarano, G. (2012). EEG biometrics for individual recognition in resting state with closed eyes. Documento presentado en Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG), BIOSIG-Proceedings of the International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group.
- Langleben, D., Hakun, J., Seelig, D., Wang, A., Ruparel, K., Bilker, W., & Gur, R. (2016). Polygraphy and functional magnetic resonance imaging in lie detection: A controlled blind comparison using the concealed information test. J Clin Psychiatry, 77(10), 1372-1380.
- Lebedev, M. A., Tate, A. J., Hanson, T. L., Li, Z., O’Doherty, J. E., Winans, J. A., & Schwarz, D. A. (2011). Future developments in brain-machine interface research. Clinics, 66, 25-32.
- Lefaucheur, J.-P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., & De Ridder, D. (2014). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol, 125(11), 2150-2206.
- Lewis, C., Maier, F., Horstkötter, N., Zywczok, A., Witt, K., Eggers, C., & Moro, E. (2015). Subjectively perceived personality and mood changes associated with subthalamic stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Psychol Med, 45(1), 73-85.
- Mackenzie, R. (2011). Who should hold the remote for the new me? Cognitive, affective, and behavioral side effects of DBS and authentic choices over future personalities. Ajob Neurosci, 2(1), 18-20.
- Mănuc, L.M. (2012). Features and evolution references to personality rights. Contemp Read Law Soc Justice, 4(1), 360-370.
- Marcel, S., Del Millan, J.R. (2007). Person authentication using brainwaves (EEG) and maximum a posteriori model adaptation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 29(4), 743-752.
- McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L.M., & Montague, P.R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron. 44(2), 379-387.
- Mirkovic, B., Debener, S., Jaeger, M., & De Vos, M. (2015). Decoding the attended speech stream with multi-channel EEG: Implications for online, daily-life applications. J Neural Eng., 12(4), 046007.
- Mitchell, V. (1990). Enemy Unseen. Simon and Schuster, vol. 51.
- Mohammadi, G., Shoushtari, P., Molaee Ardekani, B., & Shamsollahi, M. B. (2006). Person identification by using AR model for EEG signals. Documento presentado en Proceeding of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.
- Moore, A.D. (2010). Privacy rights: Moral and legal foundations. Penn State Press.
- Nabavi, S., Fox, R., Proulx, C. D., Lin, J.Y., Tsien, R.Y., & Malinow, R. (2014). Engineering a memory with LTD and LTP. Nature, 511, 348-352.
- National Research Council (2009). Opportunities in neuroscience for future army applications. The National Academies Press.
- Nickel, J. W. (1987). Making sense of human rights: Philosophical reflections on the universal declaration of human rights. University of California Press.
- Nickel, J. (2014). Human rights. En Zalta, E., (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights-human/ [Consulta: 21 de diciembre 2020].
- Palaniappan, R. (2008). Two-stage biometric authentication method using thought activity brain waves. Int J Neural Syst, 18(01), 59-66.
- Palaniappan, R., Mandic, D.P. (2007). EEG based biometric framework for automatic identity verification. J VLSI Signal Process Syst Signal Image Video Technol, 49(2), 243-250.
- Penenberg, A. (2011). NeuroFocus uses neuromarketing to hack your brain. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/1769238/neurofocus-uses-neuromarketing-hack-your-brain [Consulta: 21 de diciembre 2020].
- Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2008). The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Int J Appl Philos, 25(3), 162-177.
- Pham, U., Solbakk, A.-K., Skogseid, I.-M., Toft, M., Pripp, A.H., Konglund, A.E., & Dietrichs, E. (2015). Personality changes after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Disease. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/490507
- Powell, C., Munetomo, M., Schlueter, M., Mizukoshi, M. (2013). Towards thought control of next-generation wearable computing devices Documento presentado en International Conference on Brain and Health Informatics.
- Pycroft, L., Boccard, S.G., Owen, S.L.F., Stein, J.F., Fitzgerald, J.J., Green, A.L., & Aziz, T.Z. (2016). Brainjacking: Implant Security Issues in Invasive Neuromodulation. World Neurosurg, 92, 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.010.
- Redmayne, M. (2007). Rethinking the privilege against self-incrimination. Oxf J Leg Stud, 27(2), 209-232.
- Ross, C. A. (2007). Ethics of CIA and military contracting by psychiatrists and psychologists. Ethical Hum Psychol Psychiatry, 9(1), 25-34.
- Schreiber, D., Fonzo, G., Simmons, A.N., Dawes, C.T., Flagan, T., Fowler, J.H., & Paulus, M.P. (2013). Red brain, blue brain: Evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PLoS One, 8(2), e52970.
- Schüpbach, M., Gargiulo, M., Welter, M., Mallet, L., Behar, C., Houeto, J., & Agid, Y. (2006). Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease A distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology, 66(12), 1811-1816.
- Sensi, M., Eleopra, R., Cavallo, M., Sette, E., Milani, P., Quatrale, R., & Granieri, E. (2004). Explosive-aggressive behavior related to bilateral subthalamic stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 10(4), 247-251.
- Sententia, W. (2004). Neuroethical considerations: Cognitive liberty and converging technologies for improving human cognition. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1013(1), 221-228.
- Sepuldeva, M., Van Banning, T., van Genugten, W. (2004). Human Rights Reference Handbook. University for Peace.
- Shen, F. X. (2013). Neuroscience, mental privacy, and the law. Harv JL & Pub Pol’y, 36, 653-713.
- Singer, N. (2010). Making ads that whisper to the brain. N Y Times Mag, 14, 14.
- Smith, K. (2013). Reading minds. Nature, 502, 428-430.
- Stanley, J. (2012). High-tech “mind readers” are latest effort to detect lies [Comunicado de prensa]. Recuperado de https://www.aclu.org/blog/high-tech-mind-readers-are-latest-effort-detect-lies
- Tiedemann, P. (2016). Identity and human rights: Considerations on a human right to identity Right to Identity. Franz Steiner.
- Trechsel, S. (2005). Human rights in criminal proceedings. Oxford University Press.
- Ulman, Y.I., Cakar, T., Yildiz, G. (2015). Ethical issues in neuromarketing: “I consume, therefore I am!”. Sci Eng Ethics, 21(5), 1271–84.
- Warren, S.D., & Brandeis, L.D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harv Law Rev, 15, 193-220.
- Westin, A. F. (1968). Privacy and freedom. Washington Lee Law Rev, 25(1), 166.
- Wolpe, P. R. (2009). Is my mind mine? Neuroethics and brain imaging. En V. Ravitsky, A. Fiester, A. Caplan (Eds.), The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics (pp. 86–93). Springer.
- Yuan, B. J., Hsieh, C.-H., Chang, C.-C. (2010). National technology foresight research: A literature review from 1984 to 2005. Int J Foresight Innov Policy, 6(1), 5-35.