Vol. 41 No. 2 (2021)
Thematic section

Responses

PDF
  • David Ripley
David Ripley
Philosophy Department, Monash University, Australia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2021.464

Published 2021-11-01

Keywords

  • Paradox,
  • Truth,
  • Vagueness,
  • Validity,
  • Meaning
  • Paradojas,
  • Verdad,
  • Vaguedad,
  • Validez,
  • Significado
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

These are the responses!

PDF

References

  1. Barrio, E., Rosenblatt, L., & Tajer; D. (2015). The logics of strict-tolerant logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44(5), 551-571.
  2. Cobreros, P., Égré, P., Ripley, D., & van Rooij, R. (2013). Reaching transparent truth. Mind, 122(488), 841-866.
  3. Dicher, B., & Paoli, F. (2019). ST, LP, and tolerant metainferences. In C. Başkent & T. M. Ferguson (Eds.), Graham Priest on dialetheism and paraconsistency (pp. 383-408). Springer.
  4. Dittrich, J. (2020). Paradox, arithmetic, and nontransitive logic. PhD thesis, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München.
  5. Dunn, J. M., & Hardegree, G. M. (2001). Algebraic methods in philosophical logic. Oxford University Press.
  6. Fischer, M., Nicolai, C., & Dopico, P. (2021). Nonclassical truth with classical strength: A proof-theoretic analysis of compositional truth over HYPE. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020321000137
  7. Frege, G. (1897/1979. Logic. In H. Hermes, F. Kambartel & F. Kaulbach (Eds.), Posthumous writings (pp. 127-151). Basil Blackwell.
  8. French, R., & Ripley, D. (2019). Valuations: bi, tri, and tetra. Studia Logica, 107(6), 1313-1346.
  9. Freud, S. (1925/1961). Negation (1925). In J. Strachey, A. Freud, A. Strachey & A. Tyson (Eds.), The Ego and the Id and other works (vol. 19, pp. 235-239). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. The Hogarth Press.
  10. Gentzen, G. (1969). Investigations into logical deduction (1935). In M. E. Szabo (Ed.), The Collected papers of Gerhard Gentzen (pp. 68-131). North-Holland.
  11. Ginn, M. [@shutupmikeginn]. (2013, November 21). My “Not involved in human trafficking” T-shirt has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my shirt. [Tweet]. Twitter. https://web.archive.org/web/20210605083513/https://twitter.com/shutupmikeginn/status/403359911481839617
  12. Halbach, V. (2011). Axiomatic theories of truth. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Halbach, V., & Nicolai, C. (2018). On the costs of nonclassical logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47(2), 227-257.
  14. Hilbert, M., & López, P. (2011). The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332(6025), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200970.
  15. Humberstone, L. (2011). The connectives. The MIT Press.
  16. Picollo, L. (2020). Truth in a logic of formal inconsistency: How classical can it get? Logic Journal of the IGPL, 28(5), 771-806.
  17. Price, H. (1983). Sense, assertion, Dummett, and denial. Mind, 92(366), 161-173.
  18. Ripley, D. (2012). Conservatively extending classical logic with transparent truth. Review of Symbolic Logic, 5(2), 354-378.
  19. Ripley, D. (2013). Revising up: Strengthening classical logic in the face of paradox. Philosophers’ Imprint, 13(5), 1-13.
  20. Ripley, D. (2017a). Bilateralism, coherence, warrant. In F. Moltmann & M. Textor (Eds.), Act-based conceptions of propositional content: Contemporary and historical perspectives (pp. 307-324). Oxford University Press.
  21. Ripley, D. (2017b). On the ‘transitivity’ of consequence relations. Journal of Logic and Computation, 28(2), 433–450.
  22. Ripley, D. (2020). Denial. In V. Déprez & M. T. Espinal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of negation (pp. 47-57). Oxford University Press.
  23. Scott, D. (1974). Completeness and axiomatizability in many-valued logic. In L. Henkin (Ed.), Proceedings of the Tarski symposium (pp. 411–436). American Mathematical Society.
  24. Shoesmith, D. J., & Smiley, T. J. (1978). Multiple-conclusion logic. Cambridge University Press.

Most read articles by the same author(s)