Published 2022-05-01
Keywords
- Metainferencias,
- Seguimiento de reglas,
- Modus Ponens
- Metainferences,
- Following Rules,
- Modus Ponens
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Do we follow rules of inference when reasoning? As intuitive as the positive answer to this question is, there are a number of difficulties in linking logical rules and inferential practices. The Problem of the Adoption of Rules of Inference constitutes a challenge for anyone who proposes that we can follow new inferential patterns from the recognition of rules. In this special issue, various topics connected to whether we can follow a new inferential pattern by virtue of a rule are explored.
References
- Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind, 4(14), 278-280. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/IV.14.278
- Finn, S. (2019a). Limiting logical pluralism. Synthese, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02134-8
- Finn, S. (2019b). The adoption problem and anti-exceptionalism about logic. Australasian Journal of Logic, 16(7), 231-249. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v16i7.5916
- Kripke, S. (1974). Princeton seminar on the nature of logic. Manuscrito.
- Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Harvard University Press.
- Kripke, S. (2021). The question of logic. Manuscrito aceptado en Mind para su publicación.
- Padró, R. (2015). What the tortoise said to Kripke: The adoption problem and the epistemology of logic, Ph.D. thesis. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/603/
- Padró, R. (2021). The adoption problem and the epistemology of logic. Manuscrito aceptado en Mind para su publicación.
- Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. The MIT Press.