Vol. 19 No. 1 (1999)
Articles

Acerca del impacto del naturalismo en la filosofía de la mente contemporánea

Diana I. Pérez
Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina / CONICET

Published 1999-05-01

Abstract

In this paper I examine the impact of the different naturalizing attempts in the philosophy of mind. l distinguish two different sources of these atternpts: the quinean proposal of naturalizing philosophy as a metaphilosophical program, and the project of defense of a substantive metaphysical naturalist thesis -that conflates naturalism with physicalism-, according to which our world is a "causally self-enclosed system" (Armstrong 1978). I argue that the main common denominator is the idea of rethinking the relationship between philosophy, science and common scnse, but that it does not imply that philosophy loses its own distinctive methods nor that philosophical problems are to be replaced by scientific ones.

References

  1. Almeder, R. (1990): “On Naturalizing Epistemology”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 27, N° 4.
  2. Armstrong, D. M. (1978): “Naturalism, Materialism, and First Philosophy”, Philosophia (8), 2-3.
  3. Bealer, G. (1996): “On the Possibility of Philosophical Knowledge”, Tomberlin, J. (comp.) (1996), Philosophical Perspectives, X.
  4. Cummins, (1989): Meaning and Mental Representation, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  5. Danto, A. (1967): “Naturalism”, en Edwards, P. (comp.) (1967) The Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, MacMillan, Nueva York.
  6. Dretske, F. (1995): Naturalizing the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  7. Fodor, J. (1974): “Special Sciences”, reimpreso en Fodor, J. (1981), RePresentations. Philosophical Essays on Foundations of Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  8. Fodor, J. (1987): Psychosemantics, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  9. Fodor, J. (1990): A Theory of Content, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  10. Haak, S. (1997): Evidencia e investigación. Hacia la reconstrucción en epistemología, Tecnos, Madrid.
  11. Heil, J. (1992): The Nature of True Minds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  12. Horgan, T. (1993): Non-reductive Materialism and the Explanatory Autonomy of Psychology” en Wagner, S. y Warner, R. (1993) Naturalism. A Critical Appraisal, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana.
  13. Kim, J. (1988): “What is “Naturalized Epistemology'?” en Kim, J. (1993), Supervenience and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  14. Kim, J. (inédito): “Philosophical Naturalism: Its Sources, Claims, Status”.
  15. Kornblith, H. (1987): Naturalizing Epistemology, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  16. Maffie, J. (1990): “Recent Work on Naturalized Epistemology”, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 27, N° 4.
  17. Moore, G. E. (1983): “Defensa del sentido común”, en Escritos filosóficos, Hispamérica, Barcelona.
  18. Papineau, D. (1993): Philosophical Naturalism, B. Blackwell, Oxford.
  19. Quine, W. V. O. (1953): “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” en Quine (1964).
  20. Quine, W. V. O. (1964): From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
  21. Quine, W. V. O. (1965): “Naturalized Epistemology”, en Quine (1969).
  22. Quine, W. V. O. (1967): “Natural Kinds” en Quine (1969).
  23. Quine, W. V. O. (1968): “Ontological Relativity” en Quine (1969).
  24. Quine, W. V. O. (1969): Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, Nueva York. [Hay versión castellana que sigo en las citas y referencias: Quine, W. V. O. (1986), La relatividad ontológica y otros ensayos, Tecnos, Madrid.]
  25. Quine, W. V. O. (1975): “Cinco hitos del empirismo” en Quine (1986).
  26. Quine, W. V. O. (1980): “Las cosas y su lugar en las teorías” en Quine (1986).
  27. Quine, W. V. O. (1986): Teorías y cosas, UNAM, México.
  28. Siegel, H. (1997): “Naturalism and the Abandonment of Normativity”, en O’Donohue, W. y Kitchner, R. (1997), The Philosophy of Psychology, Sage Publications, Londres
  29. Wittgenstein, L. (1973): Tractatus Logico-philosophicus, Alianza, Madrid.