Forthcoming
Articles

Indexicality and Prominence

Ricardo Mena
Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.

Published 2026-03-25

Keywords

  • Maite Ezcurdia,
  • Nombres propios,
  • Filosofía del lenguaje,
  • Indéxicos
  • Maite Ezcurdia,
  • Philosophy of Language,
  • Proper Names,
  • Indexicals

Abstract

Ezcurdia, in Complejidad y ambigüedad, proposes and defends functional referentialism. This is a novel proposal about what makes a linguistic expression referential. In her book, Ezcurdia also argues that proper names are not indexical, despite being context-dependent. In this article I explore this idea. Doing so is a fruitful exercise, as it shows interesting connections in the philosophy of Ezcurdia. The conclusion of the article is that, given Ezcurdia’s theoretical commitments, there is no impediment to maintaining that proper names are indexical and that it is best to hold that they are. This conclusion is in accordance with functional referentialism.

References

  1. Braun, D. (2015). Indexicals. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/indexicals/
  2. Burge, T. (1973). Reference and proper names. Journal of Philosophy, 70(14), 425-439.
  3. Cohen, S. (1988). How to be a fallibilist. Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 91-123.
  4. Cumming, S. (2008). Variabilism. Philosophical Review, 117(4), 525-554.
  5. DeRose, K. (1995). Solving the skeptical problem. Philosophical Review, 104, 1-52.
  6. Ezcurdia, M. (2017). The semantics-pragmatics distinction and context-sensitivity. En J. J. Ichikawa (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of epistemic contextualism (pp. 441-454). Routledge.
  7. Ezcurdia, M. (2022). Complejidad y ambigüedad. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas-UNAM.
  8. Fara. D. (2015). Names are predicates. Philosophical Review, 124(1), 59-117.
  9. Frege, G. (1892). Über sinn und bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25-50.
  10. García-Ramírez, E. (2022). Estudio introductorio. En M. Ezcurdia, Complejidad y ambigüedad. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas-UNAM.
  11. Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. En J. Almog, J. Perry & H. Wettstein (Comps.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481-563). Oxford University Press. Trabajo publicado originalmente en 1977.
  12. Kennedy, C. (2007). Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and philosophy, 30, 1-45.
  13. King, J. C. (2001). Complex demonstratives: A quantificational account (Vol. 2). The MIT Press.
  14. Korta, K., & Perry, J. (2011). Critical pragmatics: An inquiry into reference and communication. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.
  16. Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. En R. Bäuerle, U. Egli & A. von Stechow (Eds), Semantics from different points of view (pp. 172-187) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67458-7_12
  17. Lewis, D. (1996). Elusive knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 74, 549-567.
  18. MacFarlane, J. (2009). Nonindexical contextualism. Synthese, 166, 231-250.
  19. Millikan, R. G. (2005). Language: A biological model. Oxford University Press.
  20. Mount, A. (2008). The impurity of “pure” indexicals. Philosophical Studies, 138, 193-209.
  21. Perry, J. (1977). Frege on demonstratives. Philosophical Review, 86(4), 474-497.
  22. Perry, J. (1997). Indexicals and demonstratives. En R. Hale & C. Wright (Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (pp. 586-612). Blackwell.
  23. Perry, J. (2001). Reference and reflexivity. CSLI.
  24. Pelczar, M., & Rainsbury, J. (1998). The indexical character of names. Synthese, 114, 293-317.
  25. Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford Academic.
  26. Recanati, F. (1993). Direct reference: From language to thought. Blackwell.
  27. Ruffino, M. (2022). Contingent a priori truths. Springer.
  28. Schoubye, A. J. (2020). Names are variables. Philosophical Review, 129(1), 53-94.