Vol. 44 No. 1 (2024)
Articles

Wilfrid Sellars on Social Ontology: Practical Reasoning, Instrumental Connections, and Social Constraint

José Giromini
Instituto de Humanidades, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina.

Published 2024-05-07

Keywords

  • Ontología social,
  • Intenciones,
  • Estructuras causales,
  • Coerción,
  • Normatividad
  • Social Ontology,
  • Intentions,
  • Causal Structures,
  • Constraint,
  • Normativity

Abstract

This paper identifies in the works of Wilfrid Sellars two theses that are relevant to the contemporary debate in social ontology. The first one states that we can understand social reality as partially composed of causal or constraining structures. The second states that social reality appears to agents as constituted by constraining structures. The paper defends these interpretative theses by drawing on Sellars’ writings on practical philosophy, and specially on his account of the functioning of hypothetical and categorical imperatives. Moreover, the paper contrasts this causal interpretation with the normative conceptions that prevail both in contemporary social ontology and among Sellars’ followers.

References

  1. Archer, M. (1996). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Harvester Press.
  3. Bourdieu, P. (2007). El sentido práctico. Siglo XXI.
  4. Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit. Harvard University Press.
  5. Brandom, R. (2002). Tales of the mighty dead. Harvard University Press.
  6. Brandom, R. (2015). From empricisim to expressivism. Harvard University Press.
  7. Brandom, R. (2019a). A spirit of trust. Harvard University Press.
  8. Brandom, R. (2019b). Recollection and recognition, Franz Brentano Lectures on Practical Philosophy. Universität Wien. https://bit.ly/3kXN0Lx
  9. Bratman, M. (1993). Shared intention. Ethics, 104(1): 97-113.
  10. Dach, S. (2021). Sellars, we-intentions and ought-statements. Synthese, 198(5), 4415-4439.
  11. DeVries, W. (2005). Wilfrid Sellars. Acumen.
  12. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
  13. Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. Routledge.
  14. Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint commitment: How we make the social world. Oxford University Press.
  15. Lawson, T. (2015). A conception of social ontology. En S. Pratten (Ed.), Social ontology and modern economics (pp. 19-52). Routledge.
  16. Lawson, T. (2019). The nature of social reality. Routledge.
  17. Jaeggi, R. (2018). Critique of forms of life. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  18. Kervégan, J. (2016). Towards an institutional theory of rights. En I. Testa & L. Ruggiu (Eds.), “I that is We, We that is I”: Perspectives on contemporary Hegel (pp. 68-85). Brill.
  19. Koons, J. (2019.) The ethics of Wilfrid Sellars. Routledge.
  20. Koons, J. (2021). Sellars on rational agency as presupposing collective attitudes. En L. Koren, H. Schmid, P. Stovall & L. Townsend (Eds.) Groups, norms and practices (pp. 189-214). Springer.
  21. Olen, P., & Turner, S. (2015). Durkheim, Sellars, and the origins of collective intentionality. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23(5), 954-975.
  22. Pinkard, T. (1994). Hegel’s phenomenology: The sociality of reason. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. The Free Press.
  24. Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world. Oxford University Press.
  25. Sellars, W. (AAE) (1969). Actions and events. Noûs, 7(2), 179-202.
  26. Sellars, W. (IILO) (1963). Imperatives, intentions and the logic of ‘ought’. En H. Castaneda & G. Nakhnikian (Eds.), Morality and the language of conduct (pp. 159-214). Wayne State University Press. http://www.ditext.com/sellars/iilo.html
  27. Sellars, W. (FCET) (1967). Form and content in ethical theory. Lindley Lecture Series, University of Kansas, 1967. http://www.ditext.com/sellars/fcet.html
  28. Sellars, W. (LTC) (1969). Language as thought and as communication. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 7(4), 506-527.
  29. Sellars, W. (MFC) (1974). Meaning as functional classification. Synthese, 27(3/4), 417-437.
  30. Sellars, W. (ORAV) (1980). On reasoning about values. American Philosophical Quarterly, 17(2), 81-101. http://www.ditext.com/sellars/orav.html
  31. Sellars, W. (SM) (1968). Science and Metaphysics. Routdledge & Kegan Paul.
  32. Sellars, W. (SRLG) (1963). Some reflections on language games. En Science, Perception, and Reality (pp. 321-358). Ridgeview.
  33. Stahl, T. (2021). Immanent critique. Rowman and Littlefield.
  34. Testa, I., & Ruggiu, L. (2016). “I that is We, We that is I”: Perspectives on contemporary Hegel. Brill.
  35. Tuomela, R. (1989). Collective action, supervenience, and constitution. Synthese, 80(2): 243-266.