La Ontologia Social de Wilfrid Sellars: Raciocínio prático, conexões instrumentais e coerção social
Publicado 2024-05-07
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Resumo
O presente artigo identifica, na obra de Wilfrid Sellars, duas teses relevantes para o debate contemporâneo em ontologia social. A primeira diz que podemos entender a realidade social como um conjunto de estruturas causais ou coercitivas. A segunda, que a realidade social aparece aos agentes como constituída por estruturas coercitivas. O artigo defende essas teses interpretativas recorrendo aos escritos de Sellars sobre filosofia prática e, especialmente, à sua explicação da operação de imperativos hipotéticos e categóricos. Ademais, o artigo contrasta essa interpretação causal com as concepções predominantes - de natureza normativa - tanto na ontologia social contemporânea quanto entre os seguidores de Sellars.
Referências
- Archer, M. (1996). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Harvester Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (2007). El sentido práctico. Siglo XXI.
- Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit. Harvard University Press.
- Brandom, R. (2002). Tales of the mighty dead. Harvard University Press.
- Brandom, R. (2015). From empricisim to expressivism. Harvard University Press.
- Brandom, R. (2019a). A spirit of trust. Harvard University Press.
- Brandom, R. (2019b). Recollection and recognition, Franz Brentano Lectures on Practical Philosophy. Universität Wien. https://bit.ly/3kXN0Lx
- Bratman, M. (1993). Shared intention. Ethics, 104(1): 97-113.
- Dach, S. (2021). Sellars, we-intentions and ought-statements. Synthese, 198(5), 4415-4439.
- DeVries, W. (2005). Wilfrid Sellars. Acumen.
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
- Gilbert, M. (1989). On social facts. Routledge.
- Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint commitment: How we make the social world. Oxford University Press.
- Lawson, T. (2015). A conception of social ontology. En S. Pratten (Ed.), Social ontology and modern economics (pp. 19-52). Routledge.
- Lawson, T. (2019). The nature of social reality. Routledge.
- Jaeggi, R. (2018). Critique of forms of life. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Kervégan, J. (2016). Towards an institutional theory of rights. En I. Testa & L. Ruggiu (Eds.), “I that is We, We that is I”: Perspectives on contemporary Hegel (pp. 68-85). Brill.
- Koons, J. (2019.) The ethics of Wilfrid Sellars. Routledge.
- Koons, J. (2021). Sellars on rational agency as presupposing collective attitudes. En L. Koren, H. Schmid, P. Stovall & L. Townsend (Eds.) Groups, norms and practices (pp. 189-214). Springer.
- Olen, P., & Turner, S. (2015). Durkheim, Sellars, and the origins of collective intentionality. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23(5), 954-975.
- Pinkard, T. (1994). Hegel’s phenomenology: The sociality of reason. Cambridge University Press.
- Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. The Free Press.
- Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world. Oxford University Press.
- Sellars, W. (AAE) (1969). Actions and events. Noûs, 7(2), 179-202.
- Sellars, W. (IILO) (1963). Imperatives, intentions and the logic of ‘ought’. En H. Castaneda & G. Nakhnikian (Eds.), Morality and the language of conduct (pp. 159-214). Wayne State University Press. http://www.ditext.com/sellars/iilo.html
- Sellars, W. (FCET) (1967). Form and content in ethical theory. Lindley Lecture Series, University of Kansas, 1967. http://www.ditext.com/sellars/fcet.html
- Sellars, W. (LTC) (1969). Language as thought and as communication. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 7(4), 506-527.
- Sellars, W. (MFC) (1974). Meaning as functional classification. Synthese, 27(3/4), 417-437.
- Sellars, W. (ORAV) (1980). On reasoning about values. American Philosophical Quarterly, 17(2), 81-101. http://www.ditext.com/sellars/orav.html
- Sellars, W. (SM) (1968). Science and Metaphysics. Routdledge & Kegan Paul.
- Sellars, W. (SRLG) (1963). Some reflections on language games. En Science, Perception, and Reality (pp. 321-358). Ridgeview.
- Stahl, T. (2021). Immanent critique. Rowman and Littlefield.
- Testa, I., & Ruggiu, L. (2016). “I that is We, We that is I”: Perspectives on contemporary Hegel. Brill.
- Tuomela, R. (1989). Collective action, supervenience, and constitution. Synthese, 80(2): 243-266.