Vol. 44 No. 1 (2024)
Articles

A Review of the Notion of Coherence from the Perspective of Logic defined as a Sequence of Notions of Consequence

PDF (Español (España))
  • Matías Daniel Pasqualini
Matías Daniel Pasqualini
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina / Instituto de Investigaciones “Dr. Adolfo Prieto”, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36446/af.e956

Published 2024-05-07

Keywords

  • Coherencia,
  • Lógicas metainferenciales,
  • Recursividad,
  • Uniformidad
  • Coherence,
  • Metainferential Logics,
  • Recursion,
  • Uniformity
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In the context of offering alternative logics that deal non-trivially with semantic paradoxes while overcoming the objection of incoherence usually raised against them, the BA-Plan proposes a definition of logic in the sense of an infinite sequence of notions of consequence that specifies validity standards for the inferential level and for the meta-inferential ones. The present work argues that if the convenience of this definition of logic is admitted, it is possible to disentangle the notion of coherence between validity standards from the notion of uniformity between validity standards.

PDF (Español (España))

References

  1. Barrio, E., Da Ré, B., Pailos, F., & Toranzo Calderón, J. (2022). Metainferences in three-valued logics. Manuscrito.
  2. Barrio, E., Fiore, C., & Pailos, F. (2022). Metalogic and metainferences: Is the adoption of a non-classical logic incoherent? Manuscrito.
  3. Barrio, E., & Pailos, F. (2021). Why a logic is not only its set of valid inferences. Análisis Filosófico, 41(2), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2021.461
  4. Barrio, E., Pailos, F., & Szmuc, D. (2020). A hierarchy of classical and paraconsistent logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49(1), 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09513-z.
  5. Barrio, E., Pailos, F., & Toranzo Calderón, J. (2021). Anti-exceptionalism, truth and the BA-plan. Synthese, 199, 12561-12586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03343-w
  6. Barrio, E., Rosenblatt, L., & Tajer, D. (2015). The logics of strict-tolerant logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44, 551–571 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-014-9342-6
  7. Burgess, J. (2014). No requirement of relevance. In S. Shapiro (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic (pp. 727-750). Oxford University Press.
  8. Da Ré, B., Rubin, M., & Teijeiro, P. (2022). Metainferential paraconsistency. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 31(2): 235-260. https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2022.008
  9. Hjortland, O. T. (2021). Theories of truth and the maxim of minimal mutilation. Synthese, 199 (Suppl 3), 787-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1612-8
  10. Pailos, F. (2020). A fully classical truth theory characterized by substructural means. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 13(2), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020318000485
  11. Rosenblatt, L. (2022). Should the non-classical logician be embarrassed? Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 104(2), 388-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12770
  12. Tajer, D. (2020). LFIs and methods of classical recapture. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 28(5), 807-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzy060
  13. Williamson, T. (2018). Alternative logics and applied mathematics. Philosophical Issues, 28, 399- 424. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12131